EDITION 23

EDITION 23

OCTOBER 2016
  • INSPIRED ARBITRATOR CHOICES: ADDRESSING INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION’S DIVERSITY DEFICIT By Sarah Z. Vasani
  • DISPUTE CENTRE: HOW TO SIFT THE WHEAT FROM THE CHAFF? By Arran Dowling-Hussey
  • RECONSIDERATION UNDER THE ICSID CONVENTION: REDRAWING THE LABYRINTH By Nicolás Alarcón Loayza
  • RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARBITRATION AND BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS IN RECENT CASE LAW OF THE ITALIAN SUPREME COURT By Roberto Oliva
  • WE DECIDED TO JOIN THE NEW YORK CONVENTION… WHAT’S NEXT? By Alexandra Gonçalves
  • REFORM TO ARBITRATION LAW IN RUSSIA: WHAT IS NEW? By Hanna Shalbanava
  • THE USE OF ARBITRATION IN THE RESOLUTION OF DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL TAX DISPUTES By Mayara Nunes Medeiros de Souza and Sâmila Nunes Vianna
  • THE SUCCESSFUL EXPERIENCE OF THE PRO BONO ADVOCACY GROUP DURING THE RIO 2016 OLYMPIC GAMES By Daniel Becker and Caio Gabra
  • PORTO AND LISBON CROSS EXAMINATION SEMINARS By Laurence Burger

© 2019 YAR-YOUNG ARBITRATION REVIEW - by ALLBS, LDA